Says it all really!
Twitter eh? Just a bit of a lark really...(sarcasm)
John Pilger's Article
Sphere: Related Content
To Share and Enjoy!
Says it all really!
Posted by
Pablothehat
at
07:03
0
comments
Labels: Iraq, Labour Party, Middle East, Online Communities, politics, social networking, Tony Blair, twitter
Blair silent on plans to attend torture inquiry | Law | The Guardian:
Posted by
Pablothehat
at
11:11
0
comments
Labels: 10 Downing Street, David Cameron, extraordinary rendition, history, Parliament, Prime Minister, The Guardian, Tony Blair, torture
Browsing the news whilst listening to music is a habit that many people do..put it on to random play and off you go..
Sometimes the track doesn't suit the mood of the peice at all but other times.....
Tony Blair attacks Iraq Inquiry as part of Britain's 'obsession with conspiracy theories'
Posted by
Pablothehat
at
14:26
0
comments
Labels: Britain, Great Britain, Half Man Half Biscuit, Iraq, Iraq Inquiry, Iraq war, Prime Minister, Tony Blair, United States
Posted by
Pablothehat
at
09:24
0
comments
Labels: Chilcot Inquiry, Iraq, Iraq Inquiry, Iraq war, Jack Straw, Law, Legal advice, The Iraq Inquiry, Tony Blair, Warfare and Conflict
I spent yesterday watching Tony Blair being savaged by a flock of dead sheep whilst following the comments on Twitter's #IraqInquiry.
Hardly any of the commentators were impressed by either Tony or the panel.
![]()
Posted by
Pablothehat
at
08:06
0
comments
Labels: Chilcot, Iraq Inquiry, Iraq war, Prime Minister, Saddam Hussein, Tony Blair, twitter
Posted by
Pablothehat
at
10:12
0
comments
Labels: Ambassador, Chilcot Inquiry, Craig Murry, depressed, depression, FCO, Iraq, Iraq Inquiry, Iraq war, Malaria, Prime Minister, Tony Blair, website
Do Millipedes have spines?
The government was accused last night of hiding behind claims of a threat to national security to suppress evidence of torture by the CIA on a prisoner still held in Guantánamo Bay.
An unprecedented high court ruling yesterday blamed the US, with British connivance, for keeping the "powerful evidence" secret, sparking criticism from lawyers, campaigners and MPs, who claimed the government had capitulated to American bullying.
Two senior judges said they were powerless to reveal the information about the torture of Binyam Mohamed, an Ethiopian-born British resident, because David Miliband, the foreign secretary, had warned the court the US was threatening to stop sharing intelligence about terrorism with the UK.
In a scathing judgment, Lord Justice Thomas and Mr Justice Lloyd Jones said the evidence, and what MI5 knew about it, must remain secret because according to Miliband, the American threats meant "the public of the United Kingdom would be put at risk".
The judges made clear they were unhappy with their decision, but said they had no alternative as a result of Miliband's claim. Their ruling revealed that Miliband stuck to his position about the threat to the UK even after Barack Obama signed orders two weeks ago banning torture and announcing the closure of the Guantánamo Bay prison camp.
Last night Miliband seemingly backtracked on his office's submission, saying there had been no threat by the US to break off intelligence co-operation. "It's American information and it is for the Americans to decide whether to publish their information," Miliband told Channel 4 television.
Evidence of torture 'buried by ministers' | World news guardian.co.uk
Miliband defends secrecy stance
David Miliband statement on US 'torture pressure'
David Miliband has told MPs that releasing classified US information could do "real and significant damage" to British national security.
Publishing details of the treatment of Binyam Mohamed against US wishes could hurt trust key to intelligence sharing.
The Lib Dems said documents proved the US had threatened the UK over the issue, a claim that Mr Miliband denies.
A US government letter to the Foreign Office warned of "lasting damage" to intelligence sharing if this happened.
'Real threat'
Mr Miliband has said the US did not threaten to "break off" security cooperation if its secret papers had been made public, a claim made by two High Court judges in a ruling on Wednesday.
But Channel 4 News reported that the US State Department wrote to the Foreign Office last August saying the publication of classified documents relating to the case was "likely to result in serious damage to US national security".
Disclosure of the information could also "harm existing intelligence information-sharing arrangements" between the two nations, the letter added.
So our special relationship with the US reminds me of those relationships enjoyed by the victims of sex offenders, based on threats disguised as promises. Well, "the public of the United Kingdom would be put at risk", certainly sounds like a threat to me.
On another note, it seems the new tenant of the Oval Office has finally decided whilst adding arthropods to the collection, to keep the old poodle.
"It has heard it's Master's call..." (Nod to Tolkin)
Posted by
Pablothehat
at
22:50
0
comments
Labels: arthropods, Barack Obama, Binyam Mohamed, CIA, David Miliband, Guantánamo Bay, high court ruling, MI5, national security, the foreign secretary, Tony Blair, US